<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discussion: SoundScan Sound Off</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.countryuniverse.net/2008/12/17/discussion-soundscan-sound-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2008/12/17/discussion-soundscan-sound-off/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 03:14:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2008/12/17/discussion-soundscan-sound-off/#comment-23845</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 21:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=3892#comment-23845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a truly grim list of sales for 2008. I&#039;m especially disappointed in the numbers for Montgomery Gentry&#039;s &quot;Back When I Knew It All.&quot; It&#039;s the best album of their careers and has already produced two #1 singles. If that&#039;s not a recipe for at least a gold album, then I don&#039;t know what is. These guys deserve better, but at least it&#039;s not just them - everyone seems to be struggling right now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a truly grim list of sales for 2008. I&#8217;m especially disappointed in the numbers for Montgomery Gentry&#8217;s &#8220;Back When I Knew It All.&#8221; It&#8217;s the best album of their careers and has already produced two #1 singles. If that&#8217;s not a recipe for at least a gold album, then I don&#8217;t know what is. These guys deserve better, but at least it&#8217;s not just them &#8211; everyone seems to be struggling right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2008/12/17/discussion-soundscan-sound-off/#comment-21424</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=3892#comment-21424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I missed that the list was just &quot;some titles&quot;. My mistake.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed that the list was just &#8220;some titles&#8221;. My mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soul Miner's Daughter</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2008/12/17/discussion-soundscan-sound-off/#comment-21401</link>
		<dc:creator>Soul Miner's Daughter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=3892#comment-21401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s incredibly cool how far ahead Sugarland is from the rest of the pack!   And if not for Taylor, Sugarland would have been the undeniable champs of 2008.

Kudos to Taylor and Sugarland for such a successful year.   There is something to be said for artists that truly embrace their own music and their own work.
Sure, everyone may not like them but apparently many, many others do. ... including me.
Say what you will but I find a definite artists&#039; uniqueness in these acts, unlike the &quot;hat acts&quot; that immediately follow them on this list.

Taylor and Sugarland offer another &quot;something&quot; to their fans, beit the online relationship Taylor keeps with her fans and the very relatable lyrics (audience age considered) OR the thoughtful, personal lyrics of Sugarland... not to mention how they aren&#039;t so wrapped up in Music Row.

As far as the rest of the list:  Interesting how fast Faith Hill&#039;s Christmas cd shot up the list.

Music Row needs to stop fighting the internet and learn to work with it.  Times they are a-changin&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s incredibly cool how far ahead Sugarland is from the rest of the pack!   And if not for Taylor, Sugarland would have been the undeniable champs of 2008.</p>
<p>Kudos to Taylor and Sugarland for such a successful year.   There is something to be said for artists that truly embrace their own music and their own work.<br />
Sure, everyone may not like them but apparently many, many others do. &#8230; including me.<br />
Say what you will but I find a definite artists&#8217; uniqueness in these acts, unlike the &#8220;hat acts&#8221; that immediately follow them on this list.</p>
<p>Taylor and Sugarland offer another &#8220;something&#8221; to their fans, beit the online relationship Taylor keeps with her fans and the very relatable lyrics (audience age considered) OR the thoughtful, personal lyrics of Sugarland&#8230; not to mention how they aren&#8217;t so wrapped up in Music Row.</p>
<p>As far as the rest of the list:  Interesting how fast Faith Hill&#8217;s Christmas cd shot up the list.</p>
<p>Music Row needs to stop fighting the internet and learn to work with it.  Times they are a-changin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CMW</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2008/12/17/discussion-soundscan-sound-off/#comment-20867</link>
		<dc:creator>CMW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=3892#comment-20867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Probably so, Leeann!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably so, Leeann!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leeann Ward</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2008/12/17/discussion-soundscan-sound-off/#comment-20832</link>
		<dc:creator>Leeann Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=3892#comment-20832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ha, CMW, they&#039;re probably the same too.:)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, CMW, they&#8217;re probably the same too.:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve from Boston</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2008/12/17/discussion-soundscan-sound-off/#comment-20822</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve from Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=3892#comment-20822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin and Blake, good points about Patty&#039;s  rank for album sales this year, and the perspective you put on it.

Yes, all things considered, these are fairly good numbers for Patty Loveless..GAC was good to her for a few months, but now she seems to have dropped off even their radar...and CMT pretty much followed suit with country radio and ignored her completely.

And I agree, I am so glad that Patty and Emory have the financial freedom to make the kind of music they love, without sales calculations. We fans of quality Country are the beneficiaries here.

But still, given many of the entertainers who scored a higher rank, I have to say it&#039;s that old inverse ratio thing again, where the more talent one has, the less recognition one recieves. Obviously there are notable exceptions here, but in Patty&#039;s case, as well as some others, this applies. Actually..it applies on both sides of the equation.

Oh and Country Universe has made a good impression on Patty&#039;s record label for your top 40 singles countdown. Sagauro has announced Patty&#039;s #34 ranking on their website, and used Blake&#039;s well written blurb to share the good news! Congrat&#039;s guys! 

I think that was a great move for Patty and Emory to move to Saguaro Road Records...they are a label that knows how to SHOW their appreciation for their quality artists by giving them the support they deserve. 

Jordan, I didn&#039;t realize that so few female solo artists have had #1 singles since 2005. Very surprising considering how Taylor and Carrie dominate the charts...I&#039;m glad that Sara was one of them anyway...but yeah, that is very surprising.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin and Blake, good points about Patty&#8217;s  rank for album sales this year, and the perspective you put on it.</p>
<p>Yes, all things considered, these are fairly good numbers for Patty Loveless..GAC was good to her for a few months, but now she seems to have dropped off even their radar&#8230;and CMT pretty much followed suit with country radio and ignored her completely.</p>
<p>And I agree, I am so glad that Patty and Emory have the financial freedom to make the kind of music they love, without sales calculations. We fans of quality Country are the beneficiaries here.</p>
<p>But still, given many of the entertainers who scored a higher rank, I have to say it&#8217;s that old inverse ratio thing again, where the more talent one has, the less recognition one recieves. Obviously there are notable exceptions here, but in Patty&#8217;s case, as well as some others, this applies. Actually..it applies on both sides of the equation.</p>
<p>Oh and Country Universe has made a good impression on Patty&#8217;s record label for your top 40 singles countdown. Sagauro has announced Patty&#8217;s #34 ranking on their website, and used Blake&#8217;s well written blurb to share the good news! Congrat&#8217;s guys! </p>
<p>I think that was a great move for Patty and Emory to move to Saguaro Road Records&#8230;they are a label that knows how to SHOW their appreciation for their quality artists by giving them the support they deserve. </p>
<p>Jordan, I didn&#8217;t realize that so few female solo artists have had #1 singles since 2005. Very surprising considering how Taylor and Carrie dominate the charts&#8230;I&#8217;m glad that Sara was one of them anyway&#8230;but yeah, that is very surprising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gail</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2008/12/17/discussion-soundscan-sound-off/#comment-20818</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=3892#comment-20818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just hope that 2009 is not all about Taylor Swift.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just hope that 2009 is not all about Taylor Swift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowboy Bleau</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2008/12/17/discussion-soundscan-sound-off/#comment-20815</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowboy Bleau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=3892#comment-20815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just have to say I can&#039;t believe Jessica Simpson and Taylor Swift are in the top 20. Taylor I can probably understand because she has her moments, but she&#039;s not at #1 for country, she&#039;s there because pop fans buy her stuff too.

I wish the industry had a way of seporating sales by genre so that all the pop fans who bought Jessica&#039;s and Taylor&#039;s albums were not counted in this tally so we could see how they really made out in their target audience of country fans. 

I have no problem with Taylor, but I think credit in country should only be given where it&#039;s earned IN THE GENRE, not in others as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just have to say I can&#8217;t believe Jessica Simpson and Taylor Swift are in the top 20. Taylor I can probably understand because she has her moments, but she&#8217;s not at #1 for country, she&#8217;s there because pop fans buy her stuff too.</p>
<p>I wish the industry had a way of seporating sales by genre so that all the pop fans who bought Jessica&#8217;s and Taylor&#8217;s albums were not counted in this tally so we could see how they really made out in their target audience of country fans. </p>
<p>I have no problem with Taylor, but I think credit in country should only be given where it&#8217;s earned IN THE GENRE, not in others as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hard Times</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2008/12/17/discussion-soundscan-sound-off/#comment-20809</link>
		<dc:creator>Hard Times</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=3892#comment-20809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Out of fairness, I should note that even though &quot;Last Call&quot; dropped three spots, it still has a bullet, meaning it got more plays this week than last week. (Other singles gained more spins, pushing them higher.) So Lee Ann still could go back up again, although, overall, the drop is not a great sign.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of fairness, I should note that even though &#8220;Last Call&#8221; dropped three spots, it still has a bullet, meaning it got more plays this week than last week. (Other singles gained more spins, pushing them higher.) So Lee Ann still could go back up again, although, overall, the drop is not a great sign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2008/12/17/discussion-soundscan-sound-off/#comment-20803</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=3892#comment-20803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;&lt;i&gt;Lee Ann’s “Last Call” falls from 20 to 23 on today’s Radio and Records singles chart.

All hope is lost.
&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Yea I just saw that when I checked it, I was kinda hoping it would at least make top 15. I&#039;m a bit upset that Lady A slipped from 11 to 12, I thought they&#039;d go top 10 this week. I&#039;m still holding out hope for them though!!

I had an album question, Chuck Wicks&#039; cd was released in January, has it not even sold 17,000 copies yet?? Or was does it not count for the 2008 list??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>Lee Ann’s “Last Call” falls from 20 to 23 on today’s Radio and Records singles chart.</p>
<p>All hope is lost.<br />
</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Yea I just saw that when I checked it, I was kinda hoping it would at least make top 15. I&#8217;m a bit upset that Lady A slipped from 11 to 12, I thought they&#8217;d go top 10 this week. I&#8217;m still holding out hope for them though!!</p>
<p>I had an album question, Chuck Wicks&#8217; cd was released in January, has it not even sold 17,000 copies yet?? Or was does it not count for the 2008 list??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
