<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACM Album of the Year Criteria Amended</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/02/12/acm-album-of-the-year-criteria-amended/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/02/12/acm-album-of-the-year-criteria-amended/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:43:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ACM Officials Reconsider Criteria For Album of the Year &#124; The 9513</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/02/12/acm-album-of-the-year-criteria-amended/#comment-40430</link>
		<dc:creator>ACM Officials Reconsider Criteria For Album of the Year &#124; The 9513</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=7840#comment-40430</guid>
		<description>[...] from the list. It was reported that those nominations would be announced in March after a re-vote. Country Universe has the reasoning behind the re-vote via Peter Cooper&#8217;s article in The Tennes...: The album of the year nominees are … as yet unannounced. That’s because the Academy re-thought [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from the list. It was reported that those nominations would be announced in March after a re-vote. Country Universe has the reasoning behind the re-vote via Peter Cooper&#8217;s article in The Tennes&#8230;: The album of the year nominees are … as yet unannounced. That’s because the Academy re-thought [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve from Boston</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/02/12/acm-album-of-the-year-criteria-amended/#comment-40114</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve from Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=7840#comment-40114</guid>
		<description>And, hopefully, Patty Loveless&#039; current masterpiece, Sleepless NIghts..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, hopefully, Patty Loveless&#8217; current masterpiece, Sleepless NIghts..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie F.</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/02/12/acm-album-of-the-year-criteria-amended/#comment-40094</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=7840#comment-40094</guid>
		<description>And it means Lee Ann Womack&#039;s stellar piece of work should make the cut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it means Lee Ann Womack&#8217;s stellar piece of work should make the cut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt B.</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/02/12/acm-album-of-the-year-criteria-amended/#comment-39908</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=7840#comment-39908</guid>
		<description>I guess if my prediction came true then UMG would have 4 of the 5 artists (they distribute/promote Taylor Swift to retail).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess if my prediction came true then UMG would have 4 of the 5 artists (they distribute/promote Taylor Swift to retail).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt B.</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/02/12/acm-album-of-the-year-criteria-amended/#comment-39906</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=7840#comment-39906</guid>
		<description>Hopefully this means that Joey + Rory&#039;s album will be in consideration now, same goes for Kasey Chambers &amp; Shane Nicholson.  While that&#039;d be great, I get the sense that all this means is that albums by Jamey Johnson and Heidi Newfield will now be in the list and we&#039;ll then see Strait, Sugarland, and Taylor Swift as the other 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully this means that Joey + Rory&#8217;s album will be in consideration now, same goes for Kasey Chambers &amp; Shane Nicholson.  While that&#8217;d be great, I get the sense that all this means is that albums by Jamey Johnson and Heidi Newfield will now be in the list and we&#8217;ll then see Strait, Sugarland, and Taylor Swift as the other 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/02/12/acm-album-of-the-year-criteria-amended/#comment-39872</link>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=7840#comment-39872</guid>
		<description>Heading in the right direction.  At least, that levels the playing field a lil more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heading in the right direction.  At least, that levels the playing field a lil more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razor X</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/02/12/acm-album-of-the-year-criteria-amended/#comment-39792</link>
		<dc:creator>Razor X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=7840#comment-39792</guid>
		<description>Hopefully with less emphasis on sales, we&#039;ll start to see some more interesting and more deserving nominees in the album category.  I disagree, though, that the fact that only nine albums surived the 300,000 units sold requirement means that country isn&#039;t doing business.  Just a year or two ago, artists were worried about losing their record deals if they couldn&#039;t reach platinum level sales within a year of an album&#039;s release.  300,000 was considered successful back in the 80s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully with less emphasis on sales, we&#8217;ll start to see some more interesting and more deserving nominees in the album category.  I disagree, though, that the fact that only nine albums surived the 300,000 units sold requirement means that country isn&#8217;t doing business.  Just a year or two ago, artists were worried about losing their record deals if they couldn&#8217;t reach platinum level sales within a year of an album&#8217;s release.  300,000 was considered successful back in the 80s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Milliken</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/02/12/acm-album-of-the-year-criteria-amended/#comment-39735</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Milliken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=7840#comment-39735</guid>
		<description>Is it just me, or do record execs think way too much about ringtones as a sustainable source of income? To me that whole thing just screams &quot;fad.&quot;

Anyways, this is definitely good news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me, or do record execs think way too much about ringtones as a sustainable source of income? To me that whole thing just screams &#8220;fad.&#8221;</p>
<p>Anyways, this is definitely good news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

