<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women of the Decade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/10/18/women-of-the-decade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/10/18/women-of-the-decade/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 05:18:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/10/18/women-of-the-decade/#comment-113990</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=12927#comment-113990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was curious about the correlation between album sales and singles.  Here are the same ten ranked based on album sales.  Information from RIAA for albums released since 2000.  This was my math so could very well be wrong =)

Shania Twain - 15 Million
Faith Hill - 12 Million
Carrie Underwood - 9 Million
Taylor Swift - 8 Million
Reba - 6 Million
Gretchen Wilson - 6 Million
Martina McBride - 4.5 Million
Sara Evams - 4 Million
LeAnn Rimes - 3 Million

Compare this with Alison Krauss who has not had any solo top ten hits this decade. Who has over 6 Million, not including the 8.5 Million for O Brother where art thou?
Jo Dee Messina - 1.5 Million]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was curious about the correlation between album sales and singles.  Here are the same ten ranked based on album sales.  Information from RIAA for albums released since 2000.  This was my math so could very well be wrong =)</p>
<p>Shania Twain &#8211; 15 Million<br />
Faith Hill &#8211; 12 Million<br />
Carrie Underwood &#8211; 9 Million<br />
Taylor Swift &#8211; 8 Million<br />
Reba &#8211; 6 Million<br />
Gretchen Wilson &#8211; 6 Million<br />
Martina McBride &#8211; 4.5 Million<br />
Sara Evams &#8211; 4 Million<br />
LeAnn Rimes &#8211; 3 Million</p>
<p>Compare this with Alison Krauss who has not had any solo top ten hits this decade. Who has over 6 Million, not including the 8.5 Million for O Brother where art thou?<br />
Jo Dee Messina &#8211; 1.5 Million</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory DeStein</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/10/18/women-of-the-decade/#comment-109917</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory DeStein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=12927#comment-109917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin is right, the women from this decade dont really hold a candle to the acheivments of the 90&#039;s Ladies. The CMA Female Vocalist race in the 90&#039;s was always a very tight category, 1998 for example had Faith Hill,Patty Loveless, Martina McBride, Lee Ann Womack and Trisha Yearwood....all who eventually won the award. Now you have Carrie or Taylor who really have met the qualifications.Record labels have their token female act now, and they dont really go beyond that in expanding their ladies roster.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin is right, the women from this decade dont really hold a candle to the acheivments of the 90&#8242;s Ladies. The CMA Female Vocalist race in the 90&#8242;s was always a very tight category, 1998 for example had Faith Hill,Patty Loveless, Martina McBride, Lee Ann Womack and Trisha Yearwood&#8230;.all who eventually won the award. Now you have Carrie or Taylor who really have met the qualifications.Record labels have their token female act now, and they dont really go beyond that in expanding their ladies roster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/10/18/women-of-the-decade/#comment-109909</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=12927#comment-109909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that country has always been a male artist dominated genre.  From the days of labels only wanting one &quot;girl singer&quot; to a stretch of over two years without a female artist hitting number one on the charts (between Martina McBride&#039;s 2002 hit &quot;Blessed&quot; and Gretchen Wilson&#039;s 2004 #1 &quot;Redneck Woman&quot;).  While I tend to prefer female artists, it seems radio and record labels think the soccer mom demographic they are trying to appeal to doesn&#039;t.  A look at the CMA female artist nominations in the 90s reveals something interesting as well.  Back then all five artists would have a pretty reasonable shot at the award if it were based on airplay.  Patty Loveless, Pam Tillis, Mary Chapin Carpenter, Reba, Tanya Tucker, Lorrie Morgan and Kathy Mattea all regularly hit the Top Ten with three or four singles per album.  In this year&#039;s crop, only Taylor and Carrie can be considered successes at radio the way Brad, Keith, Toby and Kenny are.  Reba, Martina and Miranda either scored one or no top ten hits in the last year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that country has always been a male artist dominated genre.  From the days of labels only wanting one &#8220;girl singer&#8221; to a stretch of over two years without a female artist hitting number one on the charts (between Martina McBride&#8217;s 2002 hit &#8220;Blessed&#8221; and Gretchen Wilson&#8217;s 2004 #1 &#8220;Redneck Woman&#8221;).  While I tend to prefer female artists, it seems radio and record labels think the soccer mom demographic they are trying to appeal to doesn&#8217;t.  A look at the CMA female artist nominations in the 90s reveals something interesting as well.  Back then all five artists would have a pretty reasonable shot at the award if it were based on airplay.  Patty Loveless, Pam Tillis, Mary Chapin Carpenter, Reba, Tanya Tucker, Lorrie Morgan and Kathy Mattea all regularly hit the Top Ten with three or four singles per album.  In this year&#8217;s crop, only Taylor and Carrie can be considered successes at radio the way Brad, Keith, Toby and Kenny are.  Reba, Martina and Miranda either scored one or no top ten hits in the last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin J. Coyne</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/10/18/women-of-the-decade/#comment-109869</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin J. Coyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=12927#comment-109869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think anyone&#039;s arguing about the fact that fewer singles were released this decade. It doesn&#039;t change the gaping disparity between the genders. If the top ten men were able to score 180 top ten singles, why were the top ten women able to score only 70? 

My guess would be that the trend that began in the mid-nineties bottomed out in the mid-00s, and now there are women who really are &quot;immediate adds&quot; - namely, Carrie Underwood and Taylor Swift - for the first time in many years.  Underwood especially - nine consecutive top two hits(!) - has been remarkably dominant.

Another factor might be that the nineties featured the rise and peak of several artists like Trisha Yearwood, Pam Tillis, Patty Loveless, Faith Hill, etc. and nearly all of their top ten hits (with the exception of Hill) were in that decade.

Most of the nineties women ran out of gas at radio this decade, and the ones who nominally replaced them for a while - Jo Dee Messina, Terri Clark, Sara Evans, Lee Ann Womack - didn&#039;t have the endurance of their predecessors.

Swift, Underwood and Sugarland/Nettles suggest that country radio is open to playing women in heavy, regular rotation again. Perhaps Miranda Lambert will eventually get there as well. Seems like &quot;White Liar&quot; is flying up the chart, at least by her standard.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone&#8217;s arguing about the fact that fewer singles were released this decade. It doesn&#8217;t change the gaping disparity between the genders. If the top ten men were able to score 180 top ten singles, why were the top ten women able to score only 70? </p>
<p>My guess would be that the trend that began in the mid-nineties bottomed out in the mid-00s, and now there are women who really are &#8220;immediate adds&#8221; &#8211; namely, Carrie Underwood and Taylor Swift &#8211; for the first time in many years.  Underwood especially &#8211; nine consecutive top two hits(!) &#8211; has been remarkably dominant.</p>
<p>Another factor might be that the nineties featured the rise and peak of several artists like Trisha Yearwood, Pam Tillis, Patty Loveless, Faith Hill, etc. and nearly all of their top ten hits (with the exception of Hill) were in that decade.</p>
<p>Most of the nineties women ran out of gas at radio this decade, and the ones who nominally replaced them for a while &#8211; Jo Dee Messina, Terri Clark, Sara Evans, Lee Ann Womack &#8211; didn&#8217;t have the endurance of their predecessors.</p>
<p>Swift, Underwood and Sugarland/Nettles suggest that country radio is open to playing women in heavy, regular rotation again. Perhaps Miranda Lambert will eventually get there as well. Seems like &#8220;White Liar&#8221; is flying up the chart, at least by her standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cutting The Treacle</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/10/18/women-of-the-decade/#comment-109865</link>
		<dc:creator>Cutting The Treacle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=12927#comment-109865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s a non-female example of my point (based on Wikipedia discography summaries):

In a 9 year period from 1991-1999, Brooks &amp; Dunn released 29 singles.

In a 10 year period from 2000-2009, Brooks &amp; Dunn released  22 singles.

You noted George Strait released 19 top 10 singles in the 00s. But between 1990 and 1995, he released 21 top 10 singles.

Those are significant declines that seem to be affecting all artists.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a non-female example of my point (based on Wikipedia discography summaries):</p>
<p>In a 9 year period from 1991-1999, Brooks &amp; Dunn released 29 singles.</p>
<p>In a 10 year period from 2000-2009, Brooks &amp; Dunn released  22 singles.</p>
<p>You noted George Strait released 19 top 10 singles in the 00s. But between 1990 and 1995, he released 21 top 10 singles.</p>
<p>Those are significant declines that seem to be affecting all artists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cutting The Treacle</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/10/18/women-of-the-decade/#comment-109862</link>
		<dc:creator>Cutting The Treacle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=12927#comment-109862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you have to have the # of top 10 songs by the top 10 men in each of the sample periods (80s, 90s and 00s) to confirm that women are &quot;declining&quot; - at least relative to the overall market. But the facts that there were fewer top 10 songs by women in the 00s and that men had more hits in one reporting period (the 00s) doesn&#039;t tell us anything about whether women have declined relative to the overall country music market.

My guess is that women have declined both compared to prior periods and compared to the overall market. But my point is that the decline in decade-over-decade comparisons may be driven by factors other than declining fortunes of women (for example, maybe by the release of fewer singles).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have to have the # of top 10 songs by the top 10 men in each of the sample periods (80s, 90s and 00s) to confirm that women are &#8220;declining&#8221; &#8211; at least relative to the overall market. But the facts that there were fewer top 10 songs by women in the 00s and that men had more hits in one reporting period (the 00s) doesn&#8217;t tell us anything about whether women have declined relative to the overall country music market.</p>
<p>My guess is that women have declined both compared to prior periods and compared to the overall market. But my point is that the decline in decade-over-decade comparisons may be driven by factors other than declining fortunes of women (for example, maybe by the release of fewer singles).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin J. Coyne</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/10/18/women-of-the-decade/#comment-109858</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin J. Coyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=12927#comment-109858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know how much further you have to go into the number than what I&#039;ve already posted. The top ten women in the 2000s combined for 70 top ten hits. The top ten men combined for 180. That&#039;s an enormous gap that can&#039;t be explained away by slower chart movement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how much further you have to go into the number than what I&#8217;ve already posted. The top ten women in the 2000s combined for 70 top ten hits. The top ten men combined for 180. That&#8217;s an enormous gap that can&#8217;t be explained away by slower chart movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: highwayman3</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/10/18/women-of-the-decade/#comment-109854</link>
		<dc:creator>highwayman3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=12927#comment-109854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What strikes me the most is how directly after the Carrie boom in late 2005, how vastly the landscape has changed for female country artists. 
All of the former A-list females who released new music after this, could not get a song to number 1 or for the most part, near it.

Besides Carrie, Taylor, and Sugarland, the last female(s) to top the country singles chart were the Wreckers in 2006. Even after altering their sound to fit what is selling today, and with all the promotion in the world, Reba, and Martina can only peak at 10 or 11. Radio wouldnt even touch Sara Evans&#039; last single, Faith&#039;s Greatest Hits singles tanked. Trisha and Lee Ann can only get a lead-off single in the low teens. Shania still hasn&#039;t came back.

I guess it&#039;s sad thinking that all these artists may have peaked commerically, and we&#039;re onto a newer generation to replace them. At the same time, the quality of their music is arguably better when their unleased from the restraints of radio.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What strikes me the most is how directly after the Carrie boom in late 2005, how vastly the landscape has changed for female country artists.<br />
All of the former A-list females who released new music after this, could not get a song to number 1 or for the most part, near it.</p>
<p>Besides Carrie, Taylor, and Sugarland, the last female(s) to top the country singles chart were the Wreckers in 2006. Even after altering their sound to fit what is selling today, and with all the promotion in the world, Reba, and Martina can only peak at 10 or 11. Radio wouldnt even touch Sara Evans&#8217; last single, Faith&#8217;s Greatest Hits singles tanked. Trisha and Lee Ann can only get a lead-off single in the low teens. Shania still hasn&#8217;t came back.</p>
<p>I guess it&#8217;s sad thinking that all these artists may have peaked commerically, and we&#8217;re onto a newer generation to replace them. At the same time, the quality of their music is arguably better when their unleased from the restraints of radio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cutting The Treacle</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/10/18/women-of-the-decade/#comment-109851</link>
		<dc:creator>Cutting The Treacle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=12927#comment-109851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But Carrie Underwood was an A-lister from the start. And she&#039;s still only released 10 country singles in a period when Reba and Shania released 15 and 17.

Again, I think you have to go back and see how women have done relative to men in the same period. But I bet you&#039;d find men releasing a lot fewer singles and having fewer top 10&#039;s too.

I&#039;d be surprised if women weren&#039;d doing worse on a relative basis in the 00&#039;s as they did in the 90&#039;s. But I bet a decent amount of the overall drop (as opposed to any relative drop) is that there are simply fewer singles charting in the top 10.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Carrie Underwood was an A-lister from the start. And she&#8217;s still only released 10 country singles in a period when Reba and Shania released 15 and 17.</p>
<p>Again, I think you have to go back and see how women have done relative to men in the same period. But I bet you&#8217;d find men releasing a lot fewer singles and having fewer top 10&#8242;s too.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be surprised if women weren&#8217;d doing worse on a relative basis in the 00&#8242;s as they did in the 90&#8242;s. But I bet a decent amount of the overall drop (as opposed to any relative drop) is that there are simply fewer singles charting in the top 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/10/18/women-of-the-decade/#comment-109850</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=12927#comment-109850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The slow climb is part of it for the B-list acts. The A-listers still fly up the chart, as evidenced by Underwood and Swift racking up big numbers in recent years.

What has changed over time is the number of women included on that A-list, along with the B-list not getting nearly as much airplay as it used to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The slow climb is part of it for the B-list acts. The A-listers still fly up the chart, as evidenced by Underwood and Swift racking up big numbers in recent years.</p>
<p>What has changed over time is the number of women included on that A-list, along with the B-list not getting nearly as much airplay as it used to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
