<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Retro Single Review: Porter Wagoner &amp; Dolly Parton, &#8220;Better Move It On Home&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.countryuniverse.net/2011/10/17/retro-single-review-porter-wagoner-dolly-parton-better-move-it-on-home/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2011/10/17/retro-single-review-porter-wagoner-dolly-parton-better-move-it-on-home/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 05:18:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Foster</title>
		<link>http://www.countryuniverse.net/2011/10/17/retro-single-review-porter-wagoner-dolly-parton-better-move-it-on-home/#comment-659821</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 03:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=20035#comment-659821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ooh, I agree here. It would be interesting to hear this song redone with a better treatment, since the song definitely had potential.  This just didn&#039;t quite work though.  I did kind of like the spoken word part during the fade-out though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh, I agree here. It would be interesting to hear this song redone with a better treatment, since the song definitely had potential.  This just didn&#8217;t quite work though.  I did kind of like the spoken word part during the fade-out though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
